Questions for institutions

Simple questions for a system to answer.

Questions look at mechanisms, data and institutional accountability: how residents are protected, how real working time is measured, and who steps in when repeated risks occur.

In short: The questions are constructed as a test of accountability: are there data, mechanism, protection and time—or just general statements?

  1. How does the institution measure the quality of resident training, separate from filling staff shortages?
  2. Is there an independent reporting channel for bullying, retaliation, harassment or abuse of power?
  3. How are residents protected when the clinical evaluator also has academic or administrative power over them?
  4. What public data is there on burnout, departures, transfers and professional abandonment?
  5. What happens after an internal report: who investigates, for how long, with what protection for the reporter?
  6. What public mechanism of corrections, additions and documented response does the institution accept in the face of archives from public sources?

Tone rule

Each question must be able to receive a documented answer: procedure, report, indicator, referral channel, remedial calendar or public policy.

Rule of utility

Each question should lead to an indicator, a procedure, an audit, a responsible person, or a timeline for remediation.

For professional answer

What a resident doctor or specialist can check.

  1. Are the terms about on-call shifts, rest, coordination and rotations correct?
  2. Are the requests for indicators realistic for hospitals, UMFs, CMRs and ministries?
  3. Are there wordings that seem unfair to coordinators, hospitals or specialties?
  4. What minimum indicator would show the difference between actual training and operational work?
  5. What Romanian professional sources are missing: CMR, professional societies, Ministry, UMF, trade unions, residents' associations?